Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Clinical guidelines’ (CGs) adherence supports high-quality care. However, healthcare providers do not always comply with CGs recommendations. This systematic literature review aims to assess the extent of healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe and to identify the factors that impact on healthcare providers’ adherence.
Methods
We searched for systematic reviews and quantitative or qualitative primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase up to May 2019. The eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and cross-checked by a second author. We conducted a narrative synthesis attending to the modality of the healthcare process, methods to measure adherence, the scope of the CGs, and population characteristics.
Results
Out of 8137 references, we included 41 primary studies conducted in eight European countries. Most followed a retrospective cohort design (19/41; 46%) and were at low or moderate risk of bias. Adherence for overall breast cancer care process (from diagnosis to follow-up) ranged from 54 to 69%; for overall treatment process [including surgery, chemotherapy (CT), endocrine therapy (ET), and radiotherapy (RT)] the median adherence was 57.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 38.8–67.3%), while for systemic therapy (CT and ET) it was 76% (IQR 68–77%). The median adherence for the processes assessed individually was higher, ranging from 74% (IQR 10–80%), for the follow-up, to 90% (IQR 87–92.5%) for ET. Internal factors that potentially impact on healthcare providers’ adherence were their perceptions, preferences, lack of knowledge, or intentional decisions.
Conclusions
A substantial proportion of breast cancer patients are not receiving CGs-recommended care. Healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe has room for improvement in almost all care processes. CGs development and implementation processes should address the main factors that influence healthcare providers' adherence, especially patient-related ones.
Registration:
PROSPERO (CRD42018092884).
Funder
Joint Research Centre
China Scholarship Council
Sara Borrell contract
Fogarty International Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. Institute of Medicine (US), Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Field MJ, Lohr KN (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC)
2. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust (2011) National Academy Press (US), Washington DC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209546/. Accessed 31 July 2019
3. Gurses AP, Marsteller JA, Ozok AA, Xiao Y, Owens S, Pronovost PJ (2010) Using an interdisciplinary approach to identify factors that affect clinicians' compliance with evidence-based guidelines. Crit Care Med 38(8 Suppl):S282–S291
4. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A et al (2003) The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348(26):2635–2645
5. Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S, Ganz PA (2013) Committee on improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the challenges of an aging population BoHCS, institute of medicine. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC)