Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Women at increased familial breast cancer risk have been offered screening starting at an earlier age and increased frequency than national Screening Programmes for over 30 years. There are limited data on longer-term largescale implementation of this approach on cancer diagnosis.
Methods
Women at our institution at ≥ 17% lifetime breast cancer risk have been offered enhanced screening with annual mammography starting at age 35 or 5-years younger than youngest affected relative, with upper age limit 50 for moderate and 60 for high-risk. Breast cancer pathology, stage and receptor status were assessed as well as survival from cancer diagnosis by Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Results
Overall 14,311 women were seen and assessed for breast cancer risk, with 649 breast cancers occurring in 129,119 years follow up (post-prevalent annual incidence = 4.55/1000). Of 323/394 invasive breast cancers occurring whilst on enhanced screening, most were lymph-node negative (72.9%), T1 (≤ 20 mm, 73.2%) and stage-1 (61.4%), 126/394 stage2–4 (32%). 10-year breast cancer specific survival was 91.3% (95% CI 87.4–94.0) better than the 75.9% (95% CI 74.9–77.0) published for England in 2013–2017. As expected, survival was significantly better for women with screen detected cancers (p < 0.001). Ten-year survival was particularly good for those diagnosed ≤ 40 at 93.8% (n = 75; 95% CI 84.2–97.6). Women with lobular breast cancers had worse 10-year survival at 85.9% (95% CI 66.7–94.5). Breast cancer specific survival was good for 119 BRCA1/2 carriers with 20-year survival in BRCA1:91.2% (95% CI 77.8–96.6) and 83.8% (62.6–93.5) for BRCA2.
Conclusions
Targeted breast screening in women aged 30–60 years at increased familial risk is associated with good long-term survival that is substantially better than expected from population data.
Funder
Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/risks-causes/risk-factors. Accessed 19 April 2020
2. Howell A, Gandhi A, Howell S, Wilson M, Maxwell A, Astley S, Harvie M, Pegington M, Barr L, Baildam A, Harkness E, Hopwood P, Wisely J, Wilding A, Greenhalgh R, Affen J, Maurice A, Cole S, Wiseman J, Lalloo F, French DP, Evans DG (2020) Long-term evaluation of women referred to a breast cancer family history clinic (Manchester UK 1987–2020). Cancers (Basel) 12(12):3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123697
3. Evans DG, Fentiman IS, McPherson K, Asbury D, Ponder BA, Howell A (1994) Familial breast cancer. BMJ 308(6922):183–187
4. Eccles DM, Evans DGR, Mackay J (2000) Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet 37:203–209
5. McIntosh A, Shaw C, Evans G et al (2004) Clinical guidelines and evidence review for the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer, London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care/University of Sheffield. NICE guideline CG164. https://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG164. Accessed 2 Feb 2021
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献