Analysis of the pan-Asian subgroup of patients in the NALA Trial: a randomized phase III NALA Trial comparing neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in patients with HER2+metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with two or more HER2-directed regimens
-
Published:2021-09-23
Issue:3
Volume:189
Page:665-676
-
ISSN:0167-6806
-
Container-title:Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer Res Treat
Author:
Dai Ming Shen, Feng Yin Hsun, Chen Shang Wen, Masuda Norikazu, Yau Thomas, Chen Shou Tung, Lu Yen Shen, Yap Yoon Sim, Ang Peter C. S., Chu Sung Chao, Kwong Ava, Lee Keun Seok, Ow Samuel, Kim Sung Bae, Lin Johnson, Chung Hyun Cheol, Ngan Roger, Kok Victor C., Rau Kun Ming, Sangai Takafumi, Ng Ting Ying, Tseng Ling Ming, Bryce Richard, Bebchuk Judith, Chen Mei Chieh, Hou Ming FengORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein.
Methods
621 centrally assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd) + C (750 mg/m2 bid, day 1–14) with loperamide prophylaxis or to L (1250 mg qd) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid, day 1–14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety.
Results
104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P = 0.0011), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P = 0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P = 0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; P < 0.0001) were extended with N+C, compared to L+C. The incidences of grade 3/4 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were mostly comparable between the two arms. Diarrhea and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were the most frequent TEAEs in both arms, similar to the overall population in incidence and severity.
Conclusion
Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted.
Clinical trial registration
NCT01808573
Funder
Puma Biotechnology Inc.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference40 articles.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 3. Park YH, Senkus-Konefka E, Im SA, Pentheroudakis G, Saji S, Gupta S, Iwata H, Mastura MY, Dent R, Lu YS, Yin Y, Smruti BK, Toyama T, Malwinder S, Lee SC, Tseng LM, Kim JH, Kim TY, Suh KJ, Cardoso F, Yoshino T, Douillard JY (2020) Pan-Asian adapted ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with early breast cancer: a KSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, ISMPO, JSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol 31:451–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.008 4. Yap YS, Lu YS, Tamura K, Lee JE, Ko EY, Park YH, Cao AY, Lin CH, Toi M, Wu J, Lee SC (2019) Insights into breast cancer in the east vs the west: a review. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0620 5. Seiler A, Murdock KW, Garcini LM, Chirinos DA, Ramirez J, Jackson B, Fagundes CP (2017) Racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, risk factors, health care utilization, and outcomes in the USA. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 9:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-017-0247-6
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|