Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with invasive carcinoma ≤ 1 mm in size is defined as DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS/microinvasion) rather than as invasive breast carcinoma. The number of patients with microinvasion accounts for < 1% of all breast cancer in published studies. As the numbers are limited, the prognostic significance of DCIS/microinvasion has not been clearly elucidated. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the survival differences between patients with DCIS/microinvasion and those with pure DCIS.
Methods
A meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was performed. We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) and included observational studies published in English that contained survival details of patients with either DCIS or DCIS/microinvasion.
Results
This study identified 26 studies that described the clinicopathological characteristics of patients in both the DCIS and DCIS/microinvasion groups. Survival differences were evaluated in 10 of 26 studies. Disease-free survival and loco-regional recurrence-free survival were significantly shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in those with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–2.08; p = 0.01 and hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.45–4.41; p = 0.001, respectively). Both overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival tended to be shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in patients with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.63–4.23; p = 0.31 and hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–4.66; p = 0.19, respectively) but the difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
Our meta-analysis suggests that DCIS/microinvasion may display more aggressive biological and clinical behavior than pure DCIS, highlighting the potential need for closer follow-up and consideration of adjuvant treatment strategies in DCIS patients with microinvasive disease.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Challenge Program for Young Researchers
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB et al (2017) Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:290–303
2. Allison KH, Brogi E, Ellis IO et al (2019) Microinvasive carcinoma WHO classification of tumours of the breast, 5th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 110–113
3. Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE et al (2006) Pathologic findings from the breast cancer surveillance consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer 106:732–742
4. Bianchi S, Vezzosi V (2008) Microinvasive carcinoma of the breast. Pathol Oncol Res 14:105–111
5. Fang Y, Wu J, Wang W et al (2016) Biologic behavior and long-term outcomes of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Oncotarget 7:64182–64190
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献