Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To report the treatment utilization patterns for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer in urban mainland China (CancerMPact®).
Methods
The results presented are from an online survey conducted in September 2019 with 45 physicians treating breast cancer patients from 11 cities in mainland China.
Results
Surveyed physicians reported that Stage I HR+/HER2(−) breast cancer patients are often treated with surgery alone (42%), whereas the use of surgery in combination with systemic therapy with or without radiotherapy increases in later stages (Stage II 67%, Stage III 77%). Doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (AC)-based regimens were the most common in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings in HR+/HER2(−) breast cancer patients, across all stages. In metastatic patients, use of surgery and radiotherapy decreases in favor of utilization of systemic therapy alone. Pre- and post-menopausal metastatic patients were frequently treated with hormone therapy or AC-based regimens in first line. Regardless of the first-line therapy administered, capecitabine-based regimens were commonly used in second line. In third line, chemotherapy regimens containing capecitabine or gemcitabine were given to nearly 40% of HR+/HER2(−) breast cancer patients. There were no standard of care regimens established for fourth or greater lines of treatment. In metastatic HR+/HER2(−) breast cancer, physicians reported 50% objective response rates in first-line settings with a progression-free survival of 16 months.
Conclusion
HR+/HER2(−) breast cancer patients in urban mainland China were prescribed chemotherapy regimens more frequently than CDK4/6 inhibitors. Treatment practices varied, with physicians reporting the use of multiple modalities and treatment regimens for their patients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
2. Feng RM, Zong YN, Cao SM, Xu RH (2019) Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics? Cancer Commun (Lond) 39(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6
3. CancerMPact® Database (2021), Kantar, www.cancermpact.com.
4. Francies FZ, Hull R, Khanyile R, Dlamini Z (2020) Breast cancer in low-middle income countries: abnormality in splicing and lack of targeted treatment options. Am J Cancer Res 10(5):1568–1591
5. Valla M, Vatten LJ, Engstrøm MJ et al (2016) Molecular subtypes of breast cancer: long-term incidence trends and prognostic differences. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25(12):1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0427