Author:
Cajias Marcelo,Freudenreich Philipp,Freudenreich Anna
Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, the liquidity (inverse of time on market) of rental dwellings and its determinants for different liquidity quantiles are examined for the seven largest German cities. The determinants are estimated using censored quantile regressions in order to investigate the impact on very liquid to very illiquid dwellings. As market heterogeneity is not only observed between cities but also within a city, each of the seven cities is considered individually. Micro data for almost 500,000 observations from 2013 to 2017 is used to examine the time on market. Substantial differences in the magnitude and direction of the regression coefficients for the different liquidity quantiles are found. Furthermore, both the magnitude and direction of the impact of an explanatory variable on the liquidity, differ between the cities. To the best of the authors’ knowledge this is the first paper, to apply censored quantile regressions to liquidity analysis of the real estate rental market. The model reveals that the proportionality assumption underlying the Cox proportional hazards model cannot be confirmed for all variables across all cities, but for most of them.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference41 articles.
1. Allen MT, Rutherford RC, Thomson TA (2009) Residential asking rents and time on the market. J Real Estate Financ Econ 38:351–365
2. Anglin PM, Rutherford RC, Springer TM (2003) The trade-off between the selling price of residential properties and time-on-the-market: the impact of price setting. J Real Estate Financ Econ 26:95–111
3. Bassett GW Jr, Hsiu-Lang C (2002) Portfolio style: return-based attribution using quantile regression. In: Fitzenberger B, Koenker R, Machado J (eds) Economic applications of quantile regression, studies in empirical economics, physica. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 293–305
4. Belkin J, Hempel DJ, McLeavey DW (1976) An empirical study of time on market using multidimensional segmentation of housing markets. Real Estate Econ 4:57–75
5. Benefield JD, Hardin WG (2015) Does time-on-market measurement matter? J Real Estate Financ Econ 50:52–73
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献