Abstract
AbstractWe develop a modified exploration–exploitation algorithm which allocates a fixed resource (e.g., a fixed budget) to several units with the objective to attain maximum sales. This algorithm does not require knowledge of the form and the parameters of sales response functions and is able to cope with additive random disturbances. Note that additive random disturbances, as a rule, are a component of sales response functions estimated by econometric methods. We compare the developed algorithm to three rules of thumb which in practice are often used to solve this allocation problem. The comparison is based on a Monte Carlo simulation for 384 experimental constellations, which are obtained from four function types, four procedures (including our algorithm), similar/varied elasticities, similar/varied saturations, high/low budgets, and three disturbance levels. A statistical analysis of the simulation results shows that across a multi-period planning horizon the algorithm performs better than the rules of thumb considered with respect to two sales-related criteria.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference26 articles.
1. Albers S (1997) Rules for the allocation of a marketing budget across products or market segments. In: Marketing: progress, prospects, perspectives, proceedings of the 26th EMAC conference, 20th–23rd May 1997, pp 1–17
2. Albers S (1998) Regeln für die Allokation eines marketing-budgets auf Produkte oder Marktsegmente. Z Betriebswirt Forsch 50(3):211–235
3. Albers S, Mantrala MK, Sridhar S (2010) Personal selling elasticities: a meta-analysis. J Market Res 47(5):840–853
4. Assmus G, Farley JU, Lehmann DR (1984) How advertising affects sales: Meta-analysis of econometric results. J Market Res 21:65–74
5. Bates D, Watts D (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, Hoboken
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献