Author:
Eulerich Marc,Fligge Benjamin
Abstract
AbstractDespite the current trend toward refocusing on the core business, the empirical results on the conglomerate discount are conflicting and provide opposing implications to managers as to whether they should pursue diversification or not. Prior literature has employed various research designs, all of which have the potential to impact results. In this study, we analyze which design choices affect the conglomerate discount. We analyze a sample of approximately 6000 German firm-years between 2000 and 2019 and find a conglomerate discount of 7.9–11.5%. Our findings reveal that design choices related to self-selection have the highest impact on the results. Using a 2SLS approach, we find no causal relationship between diversification and market value despite testing various sets of instruments and excess values. Our results inform practitioners and researchers regarding the impact of design choices on the magnitude and existence of the conglomerate discount.
Funder
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference58 articles.
1. Altieri M, Nicodano G (2022) Survival and conglomerate value. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/1a624985-8f21-4500-b39f-c565ef4be06e/SSRN-id3339160.pdf
2. Ammann M, Hoechle D, Schmid M (2012) Is there really no conglomerate discount? J Bus Finance Account 39:264–288
3. Anderson RC, Reeb DM (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. J Finance 28:1301–1328
4. Beckmann P (2006) Der Diversification Discount am deutschen Kapitalmarkt: Eine empirische Untersuchung des Bewertungsunterschieds zwischen fokussierten und diversifizierten Unternehmen und seiner Einflussfaktoren. Gabler, Wiesbaden
5. Berger PG, Ofek E (1995) Diversification’s effect on firm value. J Financ Econ 37:39–65