Abstract
AbstractDue to the rapid growth of e-mobility, increasing amounts of lithium-ion batteries are produced and returned after their lifetime. However, these returns will lead to new challenges for manufacturers and recyclers, considering the end-of-life. Especially the increasing interaction between forward and reverse supply chain and the related decision on the end-of-life options (e.g., recycling, remanufacturing, and reuse) need to be planned and executed in a sophisticated way. Therefore, we focus on the interactions between recycler and manufacturer as two of the major actors of each supply chain. We formulate optimization models for the master recycling scheduling and the master production scheduling. To analyze current decentralized decisions of the recycler and remanufacturer, we further formulate an integrated master production and recycling scheduling model. In the following, we describe the production and recycling of lithium-ion batteries in a case study. Here, we examine five different scenarios. We find that for all scenarios, manufacturer and recycler achieve positive contribution margins. However, inefficiencies always occur due to opportunistic behavior. As a result, reuse is performed only in case of centralized planning. Hence, coordination is needed between the forward and reverse supply chain to achieve the maximal contribution margin.
Funder
NBank
European Regional Development Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference43 articles.
1. Akhoondi F, Lotfi MM (2016) A heuristic algorithm for master production scheduling problem with controllable processing times and scenario-based demands. Int J Prod Res 54:3659–3676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1125032
2. Audi (2019) Audi eröffnet Batteriespeicher auf Berliner EUREF-Campus
3. Berckmans G, Messagie M, Smekens J, Omar N, Vanhaverbeke L, van Mierlo J (2017) Cost projection of state of the art lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles up to 2030. Energies 10:1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091314
4. Bichler K (1970) Verbesserung der betrieblichen Produktionsplanung durch lineare Programmierung. Zugl.: Freiburg, Schw., Univ., Diss., 1969 u.d.T.: Bichler: Lineare Programmierung und die Theorie der Produktion. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Automation und Unternehmensforschung der Universität Freiburg, Schweiz, vol 9. Decker, Hamburg, Berlin
5. Caner Taşkın Z, Tamer Ünal A (2009) Tactical level planning in float glass manufacturing with co-production, random yields and substitutable products. Eur J Oper Res 199:252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.024
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献