Abstract
AbstractIn potato breeding, maturity class (MC) is a crucial selection criterion because this is a critical aspect of commercial potato production. Currently, the classification of potato genotypes into MCs is done visually, which is time- and labor-consuming. The objective of this research was to use vegetation indices (VIs) derived from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery to remotely assign MCs to potato plants grown in trials, representing three different early stages within a multi-year breeding program. The relationships between VIs (GOSAVI – Green Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index, MCARI2 – Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Index-Improved, NDRE – Normalized Difference Red Edge, NDVI – Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and OSAVI – Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index and WDVI – Weighted Difference Vegetation Index) and visual potato canopy status were determined. Further, this study aimed to identify factors that could improve the accuracy (decrease Mean Absolute Error – MAE) of potato MC estimation remotely. Results show that VIs derived from UAV imagery can be effectively used to remotely assign MCs to potato breeding lines, with higher accuracy for the potato B-clones (20 plants per plot) than the A-clones (6 plants per plot). Among the tested VIs, the NDRE allowed for potato MC evaluation with the lowest MAE. Applying NDRE for remote MC estimation using a validation dataset of potato B-clones (100 plants per plot), resulted in an MC estimate with a 0.81 MAE. However, the accuracy of potato MC estimation using UAV image-based methods should be improved by reducing the potato canopy’s variability (increasing uniformity) within the plot. This could be achieved by minimizing 1) potato vines bending over the neighboring row, causing vine overlap between plots, and 2) plants damaged by tractor wheels during field operations.
Funder
Warsaw University of Life Sciences
National Science Centre
Aviles Johnson Fellowship
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Aasen, H., E. Honkavaara, A. Lucieer, and P.J. Zarco-Tejada. 2018. Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correction workflows. Remote Sensing 10: 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071091.
2. Barnes, E. M., T. R. Clarke, P. Colaizzi, J. Haberland, M. Kostrzewski, E. Riley, S. Moran, P. Waller, C. Choi, T. Thompson, S. Richards, R. Lascano, and H. Li. 2000. Coincident detection of crop water stress, nitrogen status, and canopy density using ground-based multispectral data. In Proc. 5th Intl. Conference on Precision Agriculture, Madison, Wisc.: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.
3. Burkart, A., V.L. Hecht, T. Kraska, and U. Rascher. 2018. Phenological analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle-based time series of barley imagery with high temporal resolution. Precision Agriculture 19 (1): 134–146.
4. CCA. 2023. Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant. https://food.ec.europa.eu/document/download/79b91903-aa0f-41cb-92aa-d8ef5481a87d_en?filename=plant-variety-catalogues_agricultural-plant-species.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2024.
5. Chawade, A., J. van Ham, H. Blomquist, O. Bagge, E. Alexandersson, and R. Ortiz. 2019. High-throughput field-phenotyping tools for plant breeding and precision agriculture. Agronomy 9: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9050258.