Monitoring Ovarian Stimulation: Current Perspectives
Reference123 articles.
1. Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(3):855–64.
2. Tomas C, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Martikainen H, et al. Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:220–3.
3. Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. High E2 levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:401–5.
4. Syrop CH, Wilhoite A, Van-Voorhis BJ. Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:1167–71.
5. Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, et al. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography prior to human menopausal gonadotrophin hyperstimulation can predict poor response of infertile patients in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:294–7.