Author:
Hubig Michael,Wittschieber Daniel,Hunold Thomas,Muggenthaler Holger,Schenkl Sebastian,Mall Gita
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Nearly all practical forensic age diagnostics studies estimate the probability distribution of the age conditional on the developmental status of a certain anatomical feature. Given such a probability distribution, the probability of a person exceeding a certain legal age threshold is computed. In court, forensic experts are often asked to summarize the probabilities obtained by evaluating different age indicators of the same person.
Objective
The present study demonstrates computation of the age probability distribution conditional on the conjunction of several different age indicators given the age probability distributions conditional on the development status of the respective single anatomical features.
Material and methods
Data from two distinctively different studies on age estimation were used to join their probability information via Bayes’ theorem. Each of the cited studies is based on the development status of only one of two different anatomical structures: third molar and clavicular epiphysis.
Results
We derive general formulae for Bayesian information joining in forensic age estimation. Posterior distributions of age class, given the simultaneous statuses of the two anatomical features are generated. Finally, the study presents the technique on an artificial case example.
Conclusion
Bayes’ theorem can be used in forensic age estimations to combine information from several different anatomical features to yield more precise probability values of age given development status data of several distinctly different anatomical features. Conditional stochastic independence of the single age indicators as used in our article has to be scrutinized and is not generally recommendable.
Funder
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford
2. Kreitner KF, Schweden F, Schild HH et al (1997) Die computertomographisch bestimmte Ausreifung der medialen Klavikulaepiphyse – eine additive Methode zur Altersbestimmung im Adoleszensalter und in der dritten Lebensdekade? Fortschr Röntgenstr 166(6):481–486
3. Wittschieber D, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H et al (2017) Systematic procedure for identifying the five main ossification stages of the medial clavicular epiphysis using computed tomography: a practical proposal for forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 131:217–224
4. Olze A, Peschke C, Schulz R et al (2008) Studies of the chronological course of wisdom tooth eruption in a German population. J Forensic Leg Med 15:426–429
5. Schmidt S, Schramm D, Ribbecke S et al (2016) Forensische Altersschätzung bei Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen: Streubreitenreduktion der Altersdiagnose durch Kombination der Methoden. Arch Kriminol 237:25–37