Abstract
AbstractThe rich body of physical theories defines the foundation of our understanding of the world. Its mathematical formulation is based on classical Aristotelian (binary) logic. In the philosophy of science the ambiguities, paradoxes, and the possibility of subjective interpretations of facts have challenged binary logic, leading, among other developments, to Gotthard Günther’s theory of polycontexturality (often also termed ’transclassical logic’). Günther’s theory explains how observers with subjective perception can become aware of their own subjectivity and provides means to describe contradicting or even paradox observations in a logically sound formalism. Here we summarize the formalism behind Günther’s theory and apply it to two well-known examples from physics where different observers operate in distinct and only locally valid logical systems. Using polycontextural logic we show how the emerging awareness of these limitations of logical systems entails the design of mathematical transformations, which then become an integral part of the theory. In our view, this approach offers a novel perspective on the structure of physical theories and, at the same time, emphasizes the relevance of the theory of polycontexturality in modern sciences.
Funder
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary
Reference71 articles.
1. Abramsky, S., & Brandenburger, A. (2011). The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality. New Journal of Physics, 13(11), 113036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036
2. Adamowicz, Z., & Zbierski, P. (2011). Logic of mathematics: A modern course of classical logic. USA: Wiley.
3. Auffèves, A., & Grangier, P. (2016). Contexts, systems and modalities: A new ontology for quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 46(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9952-z
4. Ben-David, S., Hrubeš, P., Moran, S., Shpilka, A., & Yehudayoff, A. (2019). Learnability can be undecidable. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-018-0002-3
5. Bense, M. (1960). Grundlagen und Existenzbestimmung. MERKUR, 14(149), 687–690.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献