Abstract
AbstractThe vision of integrating artificial intelligence in education is part of an ongoing push for harnessing digital solutions to improve teaching and learning. Drawing from Jasanoff and Hasse, this paper deliberates on how sociotechnical imaginaries are interrelated to the implications of new technologies, such as AI, in education. Complicating Hasses’s call for the development of Socratic ignorance to consider our predispositions about new technologies and open new prospects of thought, this paper revisits postphenomenology and Feenberg’s critical constructivist theories. While embracing the notion of Socratic ignorance, this paper stresses the importance of developing a nuanced understanding of technology that realizes its lack of neutrality and supports the creation of a deeper understanding of how knowledge is produced, deployed, and interpreted in the digital age. Thus, this paper argues that an amalgam of Hasse’s call for advancing Socratic ignorance combined with postphenomenology and critical constructivism can support students in developing a critical understanding of technology and opening new landscapes of imaginaries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Ashton, D., Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2010). Skill webs and international human resource management: Lessons from a study of the global skill strategies of transnational companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585191003729325
2. Bauman, Z. (2011). Culture in a liquid modern world. Polity.
3. Birenbaum, M. (2023). The chatbots’ challenge to education: Disruption or destruction? Education Sciences, 13(7), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070711
4. Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press.
5. Cooley, M. (1987). Architect or bee? The human price of technology. The Hogarth Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献