Taking Exception: Philosophy of Technology as a Multidimensional Problem Space

Author:

Smith DominicORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis essay develops three key claims made in my 2018 book, Exceptional Technologies. Part one argues for ‘trivialising the transcendental’, to remove stigmas attached to the word ‘transcendental’ in philosophy in general and philosophy of technology in particular. Part two outlines the concept of ‘exceptional technologies’. These are artefacts and practices that show up as limit cases for our received pictures of what constitutes a ‘technology’ (what I refer to as our ‘pictures of method’) and that force us to reassess the conditions for the possibility of these pictures. I focus on the case of autonomous vehicles here, arguing that Google Street View provides a relatively better picture for approaching philosophical issues at stake than the famous ‘Trolley Problem’. Part three then concludes with a focus on Heidegger’s ‘Question Concerning Technology’ essay. Heidegger asserts that philosophical questioning ‘builds a way’ (1977: 3). I argue that philosophical approaches to technologies might better be considered in terms of a multidimensional problem space.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary

Reference32 articles.

1. Achterhuis, H. (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

2. Bogost, I. (2016). Play anything: The pleasure of limits, the uses of boredom and the secret of games. New York: Basic Books.

3. Bogost, I. (2018a). Can you sue a robocar? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/can-you-sue-a-robocar/556007/. Accessed 18 June 2019.

4. Bogost, I. (2018b). Enough with the trolley problem. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/got-99-problems-but-a-trolley-aint-one/556805/. Accessed 18 June 2019.

5. Brey, P. (2016). Constructive philosophy of technology and responsible innovation. In M. Franssen, P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, & A. Meijers (Eds.), Philosophy of technology after the empirical turn, philosophy of engineering and technology, 23 (pp. 127–143). Cham: Springer International.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3