Abstract
AbstractEthnobiology analyzes the interactions between people and their surrounding environments from various perspectives. Some studies have been criticized by social scientists, who argue that ethnobiologists have insufficiently considered the conflicts between the dominant economic and political model and rural communities’ lives, which are often idealized. However, several ethnobiological studies have increasingly considered these aspects, and important initiatives in this direction have emerged from interactions with other research fields and frameworks, such as sustainability science, political ecology, agroecology, and social-ecological systems. To address criticism on what has been considered ethnobiological utopianism, it is valuable to theorize, develop methodological tools, and construct explanatory models. From such perspective, this work aims to recover an old theory called ecosymbiotic complementarity, which we propose can strengthen analytical approaches in the social-ecological systems framework. We recover the original proposal of the ecosymbiotic complementarity theory, emphasizing the relationships between rural communities and economic and political variables. We consider that the ecosymbiotic complementarity theory can contribute to the contextualization of rural societies analyzed in ethnobiological research.
Funder
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Adger, W. N., S. Dessai, M. Goulden, M. Hulme, I. Lorenzoni, D.R. Nelson, L.O. Naess, J. Wolf, and A. Wreford. 2009. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Climatic Change 93: 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
2. Albuquerque, U. P., and R. R. Nóbrega Alves. 2016. What Is Ethnobiology? In: Introduction to Ethnobiology, eds. U. P. Albuquerque, and R. R. Nóbrega Alves, 3–7. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
3. Alexiades, M. 2018. La antropología ambiental: una visión desde el Antropoceno. In: Antropología Ambiental: Conocimientos y Prácticas Locales a las Puertas del Antropoceno., eds. B. Santamarina, A. Coca, and O. Beltrán, 7–70. Barcelona, Spain: ICARIA.
4. Altieri, M. A., and V. M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution of Latin America: rescuing nature, securing food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(3): 587-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947
5. Arellanes-Cancino, Y., and A. Casas. 2011. Los Mercados Tradicionales Del Valle De Tehuacán-Cuicatlán: Antecedentes Y Situación Actual. Nueva Antropología 24(74): 93-123.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献