An investigation into the usefulness of a cladistic approach to the study of the origin of anatomically modern humans-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An investigation into the usefulness of a cladistic approach to the study of the origin of anatomically modern humans

Published:1989-08 Issue:4 Volume:4 Page:241-252
ISSN:0393-9375
Container-title:Human Evolution
language:en
Short-container-title:Hum. Evol.

Author:

Habgood P. J.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anthropology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02437264.pdf

Reference81 articles.

1. Andrews P., 1984a.An alternative interpretation of the characters used to define Homo erectus. Courier Forschungs institut Senckenberg, 69: 167–175.

2. Andrews P., 1984b.The Descent of Man. New Scientists, 102: 24–25.

3. Asfaw B., 1983.A new hominid parietal from Bodo, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 61: 367–371.

4. Ashlock P. D., 1971.Monophyly and associated terms. Systematic Zoology, 16: 63–69.

5. Ashlock P. D., 1972.Monophyly again. Systematic Zoology, 21: 430–438.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Phylogenetic analysis of the calvaria of Homo floresiensis;Comptes Rendus Palevol;2016-04

2. Statistical and biological definitions of “anatomically modern” humans: Suggestions for a unified approach to modern morphology;Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews;2008-02-22

3. The origin of modern anatomy: By speciation or intraspecific evolution?;Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews;2008-02-22

4. Comparison of craniofacial features of major human groups;American Journal of Physical Anthropology;1996-03

5. Relations among the great apes and humans: New interpretations based on the fossil great apeDryopithecus;American Journal of Physical Anthropology;1994