Abstract
AbstractWe report the results of an experimental test of whether preaching the normative appeal of the sure-thing principle leads decision-makers to make choices that satisfy it. We use Allais-type decision problems to observe the incentive-compatible choices of 147 subjects, which either violate the sure-thing principle or adhere to it. Subjects are presented with normative arguments that support the counterfactual behaviour and then repeat their decisions. We observe violations of the sure-thing principle are robust to its normative justification. This result replicates a famous small-sample observation using hypothetical tasks that was published by Paul Slovic and Amos Tversky almost half a century ago. We argue that this finding is as relevant now as it was then and that their design can be usefully applied to address contemporary issues in behavioural economics.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences,Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Decision Sciences
Reference39 articles.
1. Allais, M. (1953a). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole Americaine [Rational man’s behavior in the presence of risk: Critique of the postulates and axioms of the American school]. Econometrica, 21, 503–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907921
2. Allais, M. (1953b). Fondements d’une théorie positive des choix comportant un risqué et critique des postulats et axioms de l’ecole Americaine. Economtétrie, Colloques Internationaux de CNRS, XL, 257–232.
3. Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2012). Risk preferences are not time preferences. American Economic Review, 102, 3357–3376. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3357
4. Baron, J. (2004). Normative models of judgment and decision making. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 19–36). Blackwell.
5. Blavatskyy, P., Ortmann, A., & Panchenko, V. (2022). On the experimental robustness of the Allais Paradox. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14, 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20190153