Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences

Published:2012-07-15 Issue:2 Volume:75 Page:175-191
ISSN:0040-5833
Container-title:Theory and Decision
language:en
Short-container-title:Theory Decis

Author:

Abdellaoui Mohammed,l’Haridon Olivier,Paraschiv Corina

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences,Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Decision Sciences

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11238-012-9322-7.pdf

Reference41 articles.

1. (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science 53(10): 1659–1674

2. (2008) A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36(3): 245–266

3. (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty. American Economic Review 101: 695–723

4. Ashraf N. (2009) Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in the philippines. American Economic Review 99(4): 1245–1277

5. Baker R., Laury S., Williams A. (2008) Comparing small-group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments. Southern Economic Journal 75(2): 367–382

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Risk and Time Preferences of Couples in a General Population;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

2. Couple and individual willingness to take risks;Journal of Economic Psychology;2023-12

3. Intra-household bargaining for a joint vacation;Journal of Choice Modelling;2023-06

4. Couple Ethical Purchase Behavior and Joint Decision Making: Understanding the Interaction Process and the Dynamics of Influence;Sustainability;2022-07-02

5. Time and risk preferences of individuals, married couples and unrelated pairs;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics;2022-04