Author:
Feenstra Robert C.,Taylor Alan M.
Reference6 articles.
1. Labor productivity for the maquiladoras is real value-added per worker and for nonmaquiladoras is real output per worker. Both are taken from Gary C. Hufbauer and Jeffrey J. Schott, 2005, NAFTA Revisited: Achievements and Challenges (Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics), Table 1–9, p. 45.
2. Gordon H. Hanson, 2007, “Globalization, Labor Income and Poverty in Mexico.” In Ann Harrison, ed., Globalization and Poverty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER]), pp. 417–452.
3. See Margaret McMillan, Alix Peterson Zwane, and Nava Ashraf, 2007, “My Policies or Yours: Does OECD Support for Agriculture Increase Poverty in Developing Countries?” In Ann Harrison, ed., Globalization and Poverty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Washington, D.C.: NBER), pp. 183–232.
4. See David H. Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson, 2013, “The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States,” American Economic Review, 103(6): October, 2121–2168.
5. Christian Broda and David E. Weinstein, 2006, “Globalization and the Gains from Variety,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), May, 541–585.