Abstract
AbstractThe two studies reported in the article provide normative measures for 120 novel nominal metaphors, 120 novel similes, 120 literal sentences, and 120 anomalous utterances in Polish (Study 1) and in English (Study 2). The presented set is ideally suited to addressing methodological requirements in research on metaphor processing. The critical (sentence-final) words of each utterance were controlled for in terms of their frequency per million, number of letters and syllables. For each condition in each language, the following variables are reported: cloze probability, meaningfulness, metaphoricity, and familiarity, whose results confirm that the sentences are well-matched. Consequently, the present paper provides materials that can be employed in order to test the new as well as existing theories of metaphor comprehension. The results obtained from the series of normative tests showed the same pattern in both studies, where the comparison structure present in similes (i.e., A is like B) facilitated novel metaphor comprehension, as compared to categorical statements (i.e., A is B). It therefore indicates that comparison mechanisms might be engaged in novel meaning construction irrespectively of language-specific syntactic rules.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference38 articles.
1. Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2007). Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1160, 69–81.
2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. M., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In M. Taxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 285–375). London: Academic Press.
3. Bambini, V., Ghio, M., Moro, A., & Schumacher, P. B. (2013). Differentiating among pragmatic uses of words through timed sensicality judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–16.
4. Bondaruk, A. (2014). Characterizing and defining predicational clauses in Polish. In L. Veselovská & M. Janebová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language use and language structure (pp. 333–348). Olomouc: Olomouc Modern Languages Series (OMLS).
5. Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 90–95). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献