1. Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070.
2. Arciuli, J., Mallard, D., & Villar, G. (2010). “Um, I can tell you’re lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(03), 397–411. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000044 .
3. Arnold, J. E., Fagnano, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 25–36.
4. Arnold, J. E., Kam, C. L. H., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 914. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914 .
5. Arnold, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. In E. Gibson & N. Perlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 197–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.