Handling E-evidence in Egyptian and Comparative Legislation

Author:

El-Kady Ramy Metwally1

Affiliation:

1. Head of Criminal Law Department & Associate Professor, Police Academy, Egypt.

Abstract

This article aims to introduce e-evidence, describe its characteristics, examine its legal authenticity in Egyptian law, shed light on the requirements for the collection of e-evidence and its admissibility before the criminal judiciary, and highlight how e-evidence is criminally protected in Egyptian law along with the procedures for gathering and documenting it. The pervasive usage of technology in all spheres of life may be traced back to the significance of the research topic. We have come to the logical conclusion that it is improbable that a traditional or new crime would occur without leaving behind E-evidence that may be used to identify the offender thanks to the proliferation of electrical and technological equipment and the Internet. The research concluded that the effect of the changing nature of intangible forensic evidence on its reliability before the criminal courts, in a way that requires a precise legal regulation of this issue. The legislator defines a set of conditions for the procedures for collecting and documenting E-evidence to achieve the idea of its reliability and then produces its impact on the formation of the criminal judge's doctrine. It is recommended strengthening cooperation with international organizations to exchange information related to E-evidence.

Publisher

Naif Arab University for Security Sciences

Subject

Law,Biochemistry (medical),Toxicology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Epidemiology

Reference83 articles.

1. Mahdi, A. Explanation of the General Rules of Criminal Procedure (In Arabic), Cairo, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, 2003, p. 1277.

2. Arshad H, Jantan AB, Abiodun OI. Digital Forensics: Review of Issues in Scientific Validation of Digital Evidence. Journal of Information Processing Systems. 2018 Apr 1;14(2).

3. Meiklejohn S, Pomarole M, Jordan G, Levchenko K, McCoy D, Voelker GM, Savage S. A fistful of bitcoins: characterizing payments among men with no names. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference 2013 Oct 23 (pp. 127-140).

4. Quéméner, M. Les spécificités juridiques de la prevue numérique AJ Pénal (1), 2014, p.63.

5. UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime): Study on Cybercrime, New York, United Nations Organization, 2013, p.230.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3