Outcomes following severe septic shock in a cohort of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a nested cohort study from the ADRENAL trial

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pattern of acute illness and 6-month mortality and health-related quality-of-life outcomes for a cohort of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients presenting with septic shock. DESIGN: Nested cohort study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants recruited to a large randomised controlled trial of corticosteroid treatment in patients with septic shock. SETTING: Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory. PARTICIPANTS: All Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients recruited to the Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial at Royal Darwin Hospital were compared with a non-Indigenous cohort drawn from the same site, and a cohort matched for age, sex and severity of disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality at 90 days and 6 months, time to shock resolution, mechanical ventilation requirement, renal replacement therapy requirement, and five-domain, five-level EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) score at 6 months. RESULTS: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients had significantly reduced risk of death at 90 days when compared with non-Indigenous patients recruited to ADRENAL at Royal Darwin Hospital (12/60 v 23/62; adjusted odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.94]) which was robust to additional adjustment for baseline covariates (odds ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.90]). When compared with the matched population drawn from the broader ADRENAL cohort, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality (12/60 v 16/61; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.60 to 3.39]; P = 0.42). Only nine Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients provided 6-month health-related quality-of-life data. CONCLUSIONS: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients had reduced risk of death at 90 days when compared with non-Indigenous patients recruited to the ADRENAL trial at Royal Darwin Hospital, which was robust to adjustment for covariates, but similar outcomes when compared with a cohort matched for age, sex and severity of disease.