Abstract
This article analyzes the performance of three frameworks - React.js, Next.js and Qwik - that offer different methods of rendering application views. The purpose of the study was to show whether the new Qwik framework allows for better application load times compared to the other frameworks. The study was conducted using 3 applications representing the same research content, referring to cases occurring in production environments. In order to assess the performance, the Google Lighthouse tool was used, thanks to which it was proved that it is impossible to unequivocally say that Qwik allows for better optimization of the application compared to other frameworks.
Reference22 articles.
1. Presentation by M. Hevery on “Qwik + Partytown: How to remove 99% of JavaScript from main thread” at WeAreDevelopers World Congress 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dC11DMR3fU, [13.06.2023].
2. C. M. Novac, O. C. Novac, R. M. Sferle, M. I. Gordan, G. Bujdosó, C. M. Dindelegan, Comparative study of some applications made in the Vue.js and React.js frameworks, 16th International Conference on Engineering of Modern Electric Systems (EMES), (2021) 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1109/EMES52337.2021.9484149.
3. Z. Dinku, React.js vs. Next.js, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, (2022), https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/750122/Dinku_Zerihun.pdf.
4. A. Świątkowski, K. Ścibior, Comparative analysis of React, Next and Gatsby programming frameworks for creating SPA applications, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 24 (2022) 224-227, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2972.
5. T. Fadhilah Iskandar, M. Lubis, T. Fabrianti Kusumasari, A. Ridho Lubis, Comparison between client-side and server-side rendering in the web development, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 801 (2020) 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/801/1/012136.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献