Facemask Use During Graded Exercise Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Minimal Concern

Author:

Hoehing Kellie N.1,Murrell Kadeeja S.1,Fitzpatrick Rowan A.1,Keteyian Steven J.2,Zuhl Micah N.1,Nelson Rachael K.1

Affiliation:

1. 1 School of Health Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA

2. 2 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundGraded exercise testing (GXT) is a fundamental component of the diagnosis/treatment of patients with suspected/known cardiovascular disease (CVD). Amid the current pandemic, patients must wear a facemask during GXTs, yet the impact of facemask use on peak values from a GXT has not been evaluated in individuals at increased risk of developing CVD. The objective is to examine potential differences in peak values obtained from a GXT performed under facemask versus no facemask conditions among adults at increased risk for CVD.MethodsUsing a randomized, crossover study design, 16 adults at moderate risk for developing CVD completed 2 trials (facemask versus no facemask). Peak speed, grade, heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion were recorded during a Modified Bruce Treadmill GXT for each trial. Peak speed and grade were used to estimate peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak) and peak metabolic equivalents of task (Vo2peak/3.5).ResultsTotal exercise time (17:10 ± 2:04 versus 15:58 ± 1:51 minutes, P = 0.0005), peak HR (170 ± 11 versus 164 ± 11 b·min−1, P = 0.01), estimated Vo2peak (42.3 ± 8.9 versus 36.8 ± 6.6 mL·kg−1·min−1, P = 0.005), and peak metabolic equivalents of task (12.2 ± 2.6 versus 10.5 ± 1.9, P = 0.005) were higher during the no facemask versus the facemask trial. Peak rating of perceived exertion was similar between trials (18.1 ± 1.3 versus 18.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.84).ConclusionFacemask use had a significant but modest clinical impact on hemodynamic responses during a GXT among moderate risk adults.

Publisher

Clinical Exercise Physiology Association

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3