DAVID VERSUS BENTALL – A COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

Author:

STETSYUK I. O.ORCID,TODUROV B. M.ORCID

Abstract

The aim of the work: to analyze and compare the early postoperative complications in patients operated due to the presence of aneurysms of the root and ascending aorta and aortic valve pathology by the David and Bentall technique. Materials and Methods. It was a retrospective study. There were 107 patients who were routinely treated surgically at the Heart Institute of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine from 2015 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the type of surgical intervention: in group A – David operation was performed, in group B – Bentall operation. All data were collected and compared in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period. Results and Discussion. According to the duration of operations, the indicators are higher in patients of group A. Thus, the total duration of the operation was (291.23±12.67) minutes in group A and (244.418±7.67) min. in group B, respectively (p 0.001). The total duration of artificial blood circulation was (170.28±8.77) minutes in group A and (138.73±6.47) min. in group B, respectively (p 0.003). Aorta clamping time – (122.02±5.92) min. in group A and (95.82±4.79) min. in group B, respectively (p 0.000). Patients of group A had faster extubation. They spent less days in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in general. Among the early postoperative complications, it is important to note a greater proportion of arrhythmias in patients after Bentall operation. The share of acute respiratory failure with repeated reintubation is statistically higher in group B. Other indicators did not differ statistically among patients. The frequency of cell saver use was almost the same in the two groups of patients. The rate of reoperations due to bleeding did not differ statistically and was 3 (5.66 %) for group A and 6 (10.91 %) for group B (p 0.328).  

Publisher

Ternopil State Medical University

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3