Abstract
Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) are programs implemented in the workplace to support individual employees in dealing with personal and work-related problems, with the goal of improving their well-being and contributing to organizational performance (Masi, 2010). An EAP is a program sponsored by an employer, a collective bargaining group, or an association of professionals, and is designed to help identify and resolve productivity issues that may arise from employees experiencing personal problems (EACC, 1991). ABSA bank implemented an EAP as a staff wellness initiative to assist employees. However, according to management reports, less than 5% of employees are utilizing the wellness program, which falls short of management's expectation of more than 50% participation. Therefore, this study aims to determine the reasons for the underutilization of EAPs. To achieve the research objectives, the study employed both descriptive and causal research designs, and logistic regression analysis was used to statistically identify the factors that influence the use of EAPs. A survey was conducted with employees at ABSA bank, with 100 employees selected as respondents through simple random sampling. Primary data was collected using a structured questionnaire. The study revealed that employees still value EAPs and consider them important. Through logistic regression analysis, the study identified lack of information, stigma, confidentiality, trust, and peer influence as factors that affect the utilization of EAPs, as reported by the respondents. All the results were statistically significant at p < 0.05. Therefore, the study recommends that ABSA management should implement measures to ensure the confidentiality of information shared during EAPs, provide more information to employees about the content and benefits of EAPs to encourage greater participation, clearly communicate the purpose of EAPs to employees, and select a dedicated team for EAPs who understand and uphold ethical standards.
Publisher
Journal of Commercial Studies
Reference41 articles.
1. Agarwal, R. K., & Kaur, M. I. (2016). Work related stress–Overall impact and preventions. International Journal of Multifaceted and Multilingual Studies, 3(5). Retrieved from http://www.ijmms.in
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
3. Anderson, C. B., Vanessa Lencinas, M., Wallem, P. K., Valenzuela, A. E., Simanonok, M. P., & Martínez Pastur, G. (2014). Engineering by an invasive species alters landscape‐level ecosystem function, but does not affect biodiversity in freshwater systems. Diversity and Distributions, 20(2), 214-222.
4. Belle, S. M., Burley, D. L., & Long, S. D. (2015). Where do I belong? High-intensity teleworkers’ experience of organisational belonging. Human Resource Development International, 18(1), 76-96. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhrd20
5. Bennett, J. B., Weaver, J., Senft, M., & Neeper, M. (2017). Creating Workplace Well‐Being. The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献