Fact-checkers on social networks: analysis of their presence and content distribution channels

Author:

Dafonte-Gómez AlbertoORCID,Míguez-González María-IsabelORCID,Ramahí-García DianaORCID

Abstract

Fact-checking is a thriving journalistic discipline that, in recent years, has gained great prominence as a tool in combating disinformation. The effectiveness of the work carried out by these journalistic initiatives depends not only on the quality of their content, but also on their ability to reach large audiences through the same channels by which disinformation spreads. In this context, we consider it important to know to what extent fact-checkers use social networks and other types of digital channels in order to deliver their fact-checks to a wide audience, whether there are differences between the practices developed by these actors according to the type of organisation to which they belong and whether there is a distinguishing element in this regard for Ibero-American fact-checkers. This article focuses on analysing the presence on social networks and the use of content distribution tools by 104 fact-checkers from all over the world pertaining to the International Fact-Checking Network in 2020. The results show significant differences in terms of network presence based on the type of entity to which fact-checkers belong, the independent fact-checkers being the ones using a wider variety of distribution channels. It has also been confirmed that Ibero-American fact-checkers have a greater presence on social networks, use more digital tools and provide more channels to share their content than the rest of the international sample.

Publisher

Universidad de Navarra

Subject

Communication

Reference62 articles.

1. Amorós, M. (2018). Fake News. La verdad de las noticias falsas. Barcelona: Plataforma Editorial.

2. Andı, S. (2021). How and Why do Consumers Access News on Social Media? In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Schultz, S. Andı, C. T. Robertson & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf

3. Intentional or inadvertent fake news sharing? Fact-checking warnings and users' interaction with social media content;Ardèvol-Abreu;El profesional de la información (EPI) 29(5),2020

4. Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics;Barrera;Journal of Public Economics 182,2020

5. Tackling Disinformation and Infodemics Demands Media Policy Changes;Bechmann;Digital Journalism,2020

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3