Abstract
Background/Aim: Post-operative circulation monitoring is very important in replantation surgery. Vascular pathologies that occur can be detected and undergo intervention as a result of strict follow-up protocols, thus increasing success rates. Although many alternative methods for circulation monitoring are available, no gold standard for such monitoring exists. This study aimed to find a more reliable and easier method by comparing different temperature measurement methods to facilitate the follow-up of patients who underwent finger replantation after the operation.
Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective case series study. It was conducted between January 2017 and December 2019. Eighteen patients who presented with flexor zone 2 finger amputations and who had undergone replantation surgery were included in the study. The cases were randomly divided into two equal groups. While the finger temperature of the patients in the first group was measured with an indoor/outdoor temperature device, the measurement was obtained using a non-contact infrared thermometer in the second group.
Results: In our study, the mean age of group 1 was 44.33 years, and the mean age of group 2 was 45. Eleven fingers from nine patients in the group 1 and 10 fingers in 9 patients in the group 2 were replanted. All amputated finger replantation were performed. The patients stayed in the hospital for five days, were followed, and treated. The success rate based on living fingers was 54.54% in group 1 and 60% in group 2. The mean measured finger temperatures were 34.12 and 35.76 °C in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1, the mean time of measurement was calculated as 4 min 31 s. In the group 2, the mean time of measurement was calculated as 1 s. In the study, two measurement tools were used to determine fingertip temperatures in the two similar groups.
Conclusion: In our study, we found that infrared non-contact temperature measuring devices are both reliable and useful as a heat meter in the follow-up of finger after the replantation operation.
Reference7 articles.
1. Stirrat CR, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR, Bright DS. Temperature monitoring in digital replantation. J Hand Surg Am. 1978 Jul;3(4):342-7. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(78)80034-3. PMID: 681717.
2. Okutsu I. [Newly designed skin temperature monitoring system for microvascular anastomosis--an experimental and clinical study]. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 May;56(5):369-85. Japanese. PMID: 7108317.
3. Lu SY, Chiu HY, Lin TW, Chen MT. Evaluation of survival in digital replantation with thermometric monitoring. J Hand Surg Am. 1984 Nov;9(6):805-9. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80052-0. PMID: 6512188
4. Aihara M, Tane N, Matsuzaki K, Sakai S, Ishida H. The sticker-type temperature indicator in digital replantation: simplified application. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1993 May;9(3):191-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006644. PMID: 8515397.
5. Karinja SJ, Lee BT. Advances in flap monitoring and impact of enhanced recovery protocols. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;118(5):758-67. doi: 10.1002/jso.25179. Epub 2018 Aug 21. PMID: 30132901.