Abstract
This paper assesses the dangers of the use of the concept ‘culture’ in present political and educational rhetoric. The first section offers a critique of the use of the term ‘culture’ in the so-called intercultural educational efforts. It asserts that ‘culture’ in its present use is a proxy for ‘race’ and supports views, which ignore diversity and suggest, purposely or not, an homogeneity which can easily spread into the sphere of biological resemblances and differences. The paper, then, identifies possible alternative understandings of culture through the examination of the contribution of anthropology to cultural research. In the last section of the paper suggestions are made to overcome current approaches to intercultural education through a call to diversify the understanding of diversity to include not only ethnic/cultural differences but also, physical, and cognitive ones. To achieve this goal a turn to the ontological and the training of teachers as ‘critical experts of design’ is suggested.
Reference55 articles.
1. Bakhtin, M M (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics In Emerson, C. (Ed.). Minneapolis; London.: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1.
2. Balibar, É (2011). The genealogical scheme: Race or culture. An Interdisciplinary Journal in the Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 1-9. Trans-Scripts.
3. Barry, B (2002). ulture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
4. Bauman, Z (1999). Culture as praxis, London: Sage.
5. Becker, A L (1995). Beyond Translation Essays toward a Modern Philology (and others, Ed.) Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.13805.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献