Comparison of Polystemia Vera Patients Diagnosed Before and After the Updated Diagnostic Criteria

Author:

Katılmış Şevket1ORCID,Gunduz Eren2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZI UNIVERISTY FACULTY OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

2. ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSTY FACULTY OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF HAEMATOLOGY

Abstract

Polycythemia vera is a chronic, clonal and progressive myeloproliferative disease characterized by leukocytosis, thrombocytosis and splenomegaly with increased erythroid series. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory features of patients diagnosed with PV according to the 2008 and 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria and the complications that developed during follow-up, and to retrospectively evaluate the impact of the change in diagnostic criteria on real life. A total of 100 polycythemia vera patients with positive JAK2-V617F mutation were enrolled in the study, 50 between 2011-2015 and 50 between 2016-2020. When the two groups were compared in terms of laboratory values at the time of diagnosis, hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cell count were significantly higher in the group diagnosed before 2016 (p=0.036). When patients were evaluated for complications of thrombosis, hemorrhage, progression to myelofibrosis, leukemic transformation, and transformation of myelodysplastic syndrome at last follow-up, it was found that 19 (38%) patients in the pre-2016 group and 5 (10%) patients in the post-2016 group developed complications (p=0.002). The number of patients who developed a myelofibrosis complication was significantly higher in the pre-2016 group (p=0.006). The number of patients who developed thrombosis was higher in the pre-2016 group, but the difference did not reach a statistically significant level (p=0.055). About other complications, there was no difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In summary, our study found a significant difference only in the number of patients with myelofibrosis complications. Further studies with more patients will be needed to determine the impact of the 2016 change in diagnostic criteria on other complications.

Publisher

Osmangazi Journal of Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3