Abstract
Background: An incisional hernia is one of the common complications of abdominal surgery and the incidence of
incisional hernias continues to be 3 to 11% after laparotomy. The repair of incisional hernia has always been a challenge to
the surgeon. Various operative techniques for the repair of incisional hernia are in practice; however, the management is not standardized. Aim:
To compare onlay mesh placement versus sublay mesh placement in repair of incisional hernias. This prospective study Material and Methods:
comprised of 50 patients with an incisional hernia. A total of 50 cases were included in the study. Of the 50 cases, 25 cases were operated by the
onlay mesh method and 25 by sublay mesh placement.
Results: The operative time for sublay mesh repair was signicantly higher than that of onlay mesh repair, whereas, complications like
haemorrhage, seroma formation and deep surgical site infection leading to extrusion of mesh was higher in onlay mesh repair. The recurrence rate
was found to be 4% in onlay mesh repair whereas it was 0% in sublay mesh repair. Sublay mesh repair, though technically difcult, Conclusion:
and takes more time for surgery has the distinct advantage of reducing the rate of infection and recurrence.
Reference11 articles.
1. Parekh JN, Shah DB, Thakore AB. Incisional Hernias.Ind J Surg. 1980;50:49.
2. Abrahamson J. Hernias. In: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, EllisH, eds. Maingot’s Abdominal Operations. 10th ed.Prentice Hall International; 1997:548-580.
3. Nieuwenhuizen J, Halm JA, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Natural course of incisional hernia and indications for repair. Scand J Surg 2007;96:293‑6.
4. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: A 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985;72:70‑1
5. Chawla S, Singh G. Incisional hernia through nonvertical incisions. Med J Armed Forces India 2000;56(4):316–319.