COMPARISON OF ORAL IRON SUPPLEMENTS (FERROUS SULPHATE) V/S PARENTRAL IRON SUPPLEMENT (IRON SUCROSE) IN ANTENATAL PATIENTS AT DHIRAJ GENERAL HOSPITAL, VADODARA
Author:
Nimbark Neha1, Joshi Mittal2, Shaparia Sonal3
Affiliation:
1. Associate professor, Dhiraj Hospital ,Department of OBGY, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth,waghodia,Vadodara 2. R OBGY, Dhiraj Hospital ,Department of OBGY, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth,waghodia,Vadodara 3. SR OBGY, Dhiraj Hospital ,Department of OBGY, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth,waghodia,Vadodara
Abstract
Background: This study was carried out to compare the outcome of oral iron Ferrous sulphate tablets v/s
parenteral Iron sucrose injection. Parenteral iron was more benecial in quickly restoring iron deciency
in antenatal . Aim: To study outcome of comparison between oral and parenteral iron supplements in improving iron
deciency anemia in pregnant women . Materials and Methods: This was a comparative and prospective study, conducted in
Department of obstetrics and gynecology Dhiraj General hospital,Vadodara. Total 40 pregnant women with mild and
moderate iron deciency anemia were taken as cases and followed up and study was conducted for 6 months. Results: Total
40 patients , 20 taking ferrous sulphate tablets and 20 given iv iron sucrose to avoid discrepancy , were studied for prevalence
of iron deciency anemia . The anemic patients ranged from 20-35 years, of low socioeconomic status ,with prevalance in both
the primigravida and multigravida, majorly in multigravida patients . Majority of patients were seen in 14-28 weeks gestation,
which was timely managed in our setup. Majority of patients with iron deciency anemia had <50 kg weight , 13 of which had
oral treatment, while 10 patients were given intravenous iron . Majority of women in this study had microcytic hypochromic iron
deciency anemia with the nal mean hemoglobin after giving the treatment in oral group being less than in intravenous group
. 15 patients (75%) in intravenous group and 13 patients ( 65%) in oral group did not have any side effects. Side effects like
Gastrointestinal disturbance were seen more in oral group ( 5 patients i.e. 25%) while sweating and burning were seen in
patients where intravenous treatment was given ( 2 patients i.e. 10%) and the nal mean hemoglobin in intravenous group is
greater than the oral group. Thus, greater level of hemoglobin was achieved with intravenous mode in the same stipulated 6
months duration . Conclusion: The study depicts that intravenous iron is safe, convenient, and effective, without any serious
side-effects , better tolerated by the patients with higher increase in mean hemoglobin. So, it's a good substitute to oral iron
therapy in pregnant females with moderate anemia roughly at 14-28 weeks of gestation
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Religious studies,Education,Library and Information Sciences,Museology,Information Systems,History,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,History and Philosophy of Science,Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,General Medicine,Organic Chemistry,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Pharmacology (medical),Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference14 articles.
1. DC Dutta’s Textbook of Obstetrics, 9E REVISED (2018). 2. Williams obstetrics , 26E (2018) 3. R. L. Bergmann, J. W. Dudenhausen, J. C. Ennen et al., “Diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency and anemia during pregnancy and post partum,” Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 682–686, 2009. 4. N. Milman, “Iron and pregnancy—a delicate balance,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 559–565, 2006. 5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Ali M, Willan A, McIlroy W, Patterson C. Laboratory diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia: an overview. J Gen Intern Med 1992;7:145-53.
|
|