PREDICTORS FOR FAILURE OF DIRECT VISION INTERNAL URETHROTOMY (DVIU) FOR SINGLE AND SHORT BULBAR URETHRAL STRICTURES? A FACT OR FALLACY
-
Published:2022-02-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:20-22
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ijsr
Author:
Kumar Jha Ravi1, Revankar Vivek2, Singh Rajawat Mahtab3, J Sreenivas.4
Affiliation:
1. Senior Resident, Dept of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Bangalore. 2. Assistant Professor, Dept of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Bangalore. 3. Assistant Professor, Dept of Urology,Institute of Nephrourology, Bangalore. 4. Professor, Dept of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Bangalore.
Abstract
Aims & Objectives: To identify patient and stricture characteristics predicting failure after direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) for single
and short (<2 cm) bulbar urethral strictures.
Materials & methods: We retrospectively analysed 1260 adult patients who underwent DVIU between September 2007 to January 2021 in the
Department of Urology,Institute of Nephrourology(INU),Bangalore. The patients' demographics and stricture characteristics were analysed. The
primary outcome was procedure failure, dened as the need for regular self-dilatation (RSD), redo DVIU or substitution urethroplasty. Predictors
of failure were analysed. For association between categorical variables, the chi-square test was used, while the Student's t-test was used for
comparing means between groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of failure after DVIU. All statistical
analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software, with a P< 0.05 considered to indicate statistical signicance.
Results & Observations:In all,1260 adult patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.3 years were included. The main causes of stricture were idiopathic
followed by iatrogenic in 48.3% and 29.4 % of patients, respectively. Most patients presented with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms
(64.5%) and strictures were proximal bulbar, i.e. just close to the external urethral sphincter, in 38.3%. The median (range) follow-up duration was
24 (8-127) months. In 60.1% patients did not require any further instrumentation, while RSD was maintained in 28.3%,patients. On multivariate
analysis, older age at presentation [odds ratio (OR) 1.014; P = 0.02], obesity (OR 1.624; P = 0.013), and idiopathic strictures (OR 3.102; P = 0.035)
were independent predictors of failure after DVIU.
Conclusions:The failure rate after DVIU accounted for 39.9 % of our present study with older age at presentation, obesity, and idiopathic strictures
independent predictors of failure after DVIU. This information is important in counselling patients before surgery.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Reference26 articles.
1. J. T. Anger, J. C. Buckley, R. A. Santucci, S. P. Elliott, and C. S. Saigal, “Trends in stricture management among male medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty?” Urology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 481–486, 2011. 2. T. L. Bullock and S. B. Brandes, “Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States,” Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 685–690, 2007. 3. R. Veeratterapillay and R. S. Pickard, “Long-term effect of urethral dilatation and internal urethrotomy for urethral strictures,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 467–473, 2012. 4. M. A. van Leeuwen, J. J. Brandenburg, E. T. Kok, P. L. M. Vijverberg, and J. L. H. R. Bosch, “Management of adult anterior urethral stricture disease: nationwide survey among urologists in the netherlands,” EuropeanUrology, vol. 60,no. 1, pp. 159–166, 2011. 5. M. A. Granieri and A. C. Peterson, “The management of bulbar urethral stricture disease before referral for definitive repair: have practice patterns changed?” Urology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 946–949, 2014.
|
|