Affiliation:
1. Consultant Orthopaedics, Unique Hospital, Indore.
2. Assistant Professor, PCMS, Bhopal
Abstract
BACKGROUND- The present study aimed to assess and compare the radiological and functional
outcome, union time and complications in cases of extraarticular distal third Tibia bula fractures
treated with interlocking nailing of Tibia with concomitant Fibular xation either by ORIF with plate or by closed nailing.
METHODOLOGY- This was observational prospective study which was carried out at Department of Orthopedics in Unique
Super Speciality Centre, Indore (M.P.) for a period of 1 year on adults belonging to age group between 18 to 75 years of either
gender. All the cases were randomly allocated in two groups. During surgery, fracture tibia was managed with the help of
interlocking intramedullay nail in all the cases in both the groups whereas bular fracture in group A were managed using
ORIF with semitubular plate or reconstruction plate and that in group B was managed using CRIF with rush nail/ square nail/ k
wire.
RESULTS-There was no statistically signicant association between the complications and the groups (p>0.05), showing that
the complications is independent of the groups. There was a signicant improvement in the score at 3 months and 6 months
(p<0.05) in both the groups; however, no statistically signicant difference in union time between the two groups (p>0.05). Also
no statistically signicant association between the outcome and the groups (p>0.05) was observed.
CONCLUSION- The choice of xation for adjunctive stabilization of bula has no effect on the fracture tibia union and the
ultimate functional outcome. Closed nailing is better where the soft tissue morbidity is high (as in high velocity trauma and open
fractures) and where bones are weak (elderly patients). Other immunocompromised states such as diabetes in which there are
higher infection rates with traditional plating techniques.
Reference26 articles.
1. Road traffic accidents. World Health Organization. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries Last accessed on 13 May 2020.
2. Chan M. Global status report on road safety p147. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2015; 2015. Report No.: 978924 1565066.
3. Chapman M. Fractures of the tibial and fibular shafts. Chap. 24. In Chapman M, Szabo R, Marder R, Vince K, Mann R, Lane J. Chapman’s orthopaedic surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. vol 1. p. 755-800.
4. Boulton C, O'Toole RV. Fractures of the tibia and fibula. Chap. 57. In Court-Brown C, Heckman J, McQueen M, Ricci M, Tornetta P, editors. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. vol. 1. p. 2415-6.
5. Bedi A, Le T, Karunakar M. Surgical treatment of non-articular distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 jul; 14(7): 406-16.