A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE -PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT

Author:

Gowthaman M.D.1,Prema V.2,Premkumar T.3

Affiliation:

1. Final Post Graduate, Department of General Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.

2. Associate Professor, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.

3. Assistant Professor, Department of General surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamlai University, Chidambaram, Tamil nadu, India.

Abstract

Background: Wound dehiscence is dened as a partial or total disruption of the abdominal wound closure, with or without abdominal contents protrusion. It's one of surgeons' most dreaded consequences, and it's considered a serious postoperative complication with mortality rates as high as 45 percent. In the literature, the incidence ranges from 0.4 percent to 3.5 percent. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal wound dehiscence in relation to various risk variables, as well as to investigate effective management of abdominal wound dehiscence. Methods: Patients with abdominal wound dehiscence after surgery were included. In light of the substantial risk factors, the types of surgery conducted, including surgical incisions made, and the type of disease involved, an extensive clinical history was obtained. This prospective study comprised a total of 60 patients. Appropriate software was used to analyse the data. Results: Male patients had higher incidence for abdominal wound dehiscence in fth decade. Patients presenting with peritonitis secondary to hollow viscus perforation are more prone to abdominal wound dehiscence. Class 3 surgery i.e., contaminated surgeries in emergency nature has higher risk for wound dehiscence. Conclusions: Co-morbidities such as diabetes, malnutrition, anaemia, and COPD all contribute to the slow healing of wounds. Simple routine laboratory tests may aid in the identication of predisposing factors and their correction. The majority of patients can be treated conservatively with secondary suturing rather than undergoing re-exploration and surgery.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference15 articles.

1. Savage A, Lamont M. Wound dehiscence, incisional hernia, and parastomal hernia. Morris PJ, Wood WC, edts., Oxford text book of surgery. 2nd edn. Alison Langton;2000:1883.

2. Mahmoud N, Kulaylat MD, Dayton MT. Surgical complications. Sabiston text book of surgery 19th edn;2012:283-284.

3. Afzal S, Bashir MM. Determinants of wound dehiscence in abdominal surgery in public sector hospital. Annals;2008:14(3).

4. Robert J, Fittzgibons JR. Nyhus and Condons hernia. Diagnostic and Imaging of abdominal wall hernia 5th edition, Lippincott Williams;2002.

5. Gabrie¨lle H, van Ramshorst, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WCJ, Arends P, Boom J, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34:20-7.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3