Affiliation:
1. Intern Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP
2. Assistant Professor cum Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.
3. Assistant Professor cum Chief Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.
4. Professor and Head, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP
Abstract
Purpose: This study is intended to verify and analyze the dosimetric impact of Pre selected beam orientation (PSBO) and Beam angle optimization
(BAO) in IMRT for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Twenty patients of Nasopharyngeal carcinom Materials and Methods: a treated with IMRT
Plans were recruited for this retrospective study. Varian Medical systems treatment planning systems (TPS), Eclipse of version 13.6 were used for
planning. All twenty patients were treated with IMRT plan created by PSBO while choosing beam angle. Another plan using BAO used for
choosing beam angles followed by PRO optimization for inverse planning were created. Objectives of PTV and OARs are maintained constant in
both the plans. Statistical analyses of both the plans were performed using parameters; Paddick conformity index (PCI), Homogeneity index (HI),
Dose delivered to OAR and Delivered MU. The statistical data were analyzed by Student t test. In this study, out of twenty patients, Result:
seventeen patients BAO were valid for inverse planning optimization. For three patients beam angles chosen by BAO were invalid. And the
dosimetric comparison of seventeen patients between BAO and PSBO was showing similar results except for MU. The p value obtained for all the
parameters except MU, were >0.05. On taking into consideration of delivered MU, PSBO has lesser MU than BAO and are statistically signicant.
Conclusion: On reviewing the results, it is concluded that both BAO and PSBO are clinically acceptable. But on concerning the delivered MU,
PSBO seems to be better method than BAO. Also, it should be taken into account that three of the plans have been failed to optimize in BAO, since
the beam angles suggested in this BAO method does not account the limitations of machine. It shows the advantage of PSBO over BAO. Hence, we
can conclude that PSBO is a better method in selection of beam angles in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma cases.
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Molecular Biology,Molecular Biology,Structural Biology,Catalysis,General Engineering,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Process Chemistry and Technology,Catalysis,Process Chemistry and Technology,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Catalysis,Cell Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine