A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF FALLOPIAN TUBAL LIGATION FOR STERILIZATION OF WOMEN IN A LOW RESOURCE SETTING

Author:

Hamdani Mohammad Zahoor1,Ahmad Syed Nawaz2,Shah Rohul Jabeen3,Dhingra Mansi4,Singh Anurag5

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Anantnag, India.

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Anantnag, India.

3. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, SKIMS, Srinagar, India.

4. Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Altis hospital, Lucknow, India.

5. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

Abstract

Objective: To compare two methods of tubal sterilization; modied Pomeroy and a modication added to modied Pomeroy's method, in a low resource setting. In this prospective study conducted fromMethods: 2019 to 2021 in one thousand women, we compared Pomeroy's method with an other method in which a slight modication in the original modied Pomeroy's technique was introduced, in a very low resource rural community hospital with only basic operation theater facility. In modied Pomeroy's method, a loop of fallopian tube is resected and transxed with 2-0 chromic catgut surgical suture material. In our study we added another modication to the modied Pomeroy's method, wherein the proximal end of the fallopian tube was additionally ligated with a 2-0 silk suture. The patients were followed up from 6months-2 years. A failure rate of 0.4% was observed in women who underwent Modied Pomeroy's method in contrast to noResults: failure in women in whom the proximal end of the tube was additionally ligated. Additional modication to theConclusion: original modied Pomeroy's method of sterilization can be potentially promising in reduction of sterilization failure rate in parts of world where salpingectomy is less readily accepted.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3