LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF DIFFERENT RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT FOR MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Author:

Habibou Zakariaou Garba1,Yi Wang Xiao2,Pan Gao3

Affiliation:

1. MD, PhD resident of Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

2. PhD, Pr, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

3. DDS, PhD, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, and Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Abstract

Background: Several recent studies have attempted to document VBG and NVBG following mandibular reconstruction, mainly the advantages and disadvantages, but very few have specifically evaluated the differences in large parameters including both radiographic and functional aspects for long-term follow-up. However, the object of this study is to compare between two different methods of reconstruction in mandibular defects and to determine the outcomes of different reconstruction options using autogenous vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction. Patients and Methods: a total of 39 patients, 22 (56.4%) females and 17 (43.6%) males, with a mean age of 36.41 years at the time of presentation (age ranged for 48 years). Study was performed in two stages at the Department of Head and Neck Surgery - Oral and Maxillofacial oncology. In the First stage (N=39), bone-density, bone resorption, and bone graft failure were examined radiographically on panorex and CBCT. The second stage included functional evaluation (physical examination and questionnaire) based on pain, infection, speech and recurrence. Both groups were followed-up for at least 1month, 6 months and 1 year. Results:the results show significant difference in Pain after one month (p=0.032), radiodensity (p=0.05), bone graft resorption (p=0.03) for 1 year follow-up in favor of the VBG group compared to the NVBG group, there was no statistical difference in bone graft failure, infection, speech and recurrence between the two groups. Conclusion: Vascularized bone graft is the method of choice, especially in extensive malignant defects. On the other hand, novascularized bone graft (81.2% success rate) is a suitable complementary flap for mandible reconstruction mainly in benign and healthy patients. For future studies, large sample size with long-term follow-up more than 1 year will be required to validate our study.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3