Affiliation:
1. Fellowship Senior Resident, Department of Trauma and Emergency, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna-800014.
2. Professor, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna-800014
3. Assistant Professor, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna-800014.
Abstract
Background And Aims: Epidural anaesthesia is widely performed using a landmark-guided midline approach. The indistinct or distorted
landmark is associated with obesity, previous spinal surgeries, deformities, or degenerative changes due to ageing. In the present study, we
compared the efcacy of real-time ultrasound (RUS)-guided paramedian approach, and pre-procedure ultrasound (PUS) landmark-guided
paramedian approach in obese patients. Methods: Sixty patients with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 were included in the study. The
participants were randomly assigned to two groups : PUS and RUS group . The primary end point was to attain a successful placement of epidural
catheter. Variables like the number of attempts, the number of passes, the time taken for identifying epidural space(s), and time taken for successful
epidural catheter placement(s) were secondary end points and were recorded in both the groups. Results: The median number of attempts were 4
(IQR 2-4) and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively, in the PUS and RUS group (P-value < 0.001). The median number of passes, the median time for
identifying space, and the time for successful epidural catheter placement was statistically signicantly less in the RUS group, than the PUS group.
Conclusion:The time taken for the identication of the space, the number of attempts, number of passes, and the time taken for successful epidural
catheter placement was more in the PUS group as compared to the RUS group.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献