IS MICRO-ENVIRONMENT A HURDLE IN GENETIC ENHANCEMENT OF YIELD IN PIGEONPEA?
-
Published:2022-11-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:80-81
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ijsr
Affiliation:
1. Former Principal Plant Breeders, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India. 2. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India
Abstract
Yield stagnation in pigeonpea remains a serious concern. Since most cultivars in the past were bread using pedigree method, it seems that this
method was ineffective in increasing the crop productivity. To get insight into this failure, 10 highly inbred parents and their F2 bulks were
examined by comparing their single plant yield variances. Surprisingly, the inbred parents exhibited high inter-plant variability; and their F2s were
less variable than their one or both the parents. These unusual observations were attributed to the interaction of individual plants with unspecied
micro-environmental factors prevailing in their vicinity, both below and above the ground. Under such circumstances, the selections had low
heritability and unpredictable performance in the subsequent generation. Since these factors cannot be targeted through breeding, it is suggested
that the breeders should try other breeding approaches such as bulk, composites, and single pod descent. The pedigree method of breeding,
however, will continue to have its utility in the genetic enhancement of qualitative traits like yield.Yield stagnation in pigeonpea remains a serious concern. Since most cultivars in the past were bread using pedigree method, it seems that this
method was ineffective in increasing the crop productivity. To get insight into this failure, 10 highly inbred parents and their F2 bulks were
examined by comparing their single plant yield variances. Surprisingly, the inbred parents exhibited high inter-plant variability; and their F2s were
less variable than their one or both the parents. These unusual observations were attributed to the interaction of individual plants with unspecied
micro-environmental factors prevailing in their vicinity, both below and above the ground. Under such circumstances, the selections had low
heritability and unpredictable performance in the subsequent generation. Since these factors cannot be targeted through breeding, it is suggested
that the breeders should try other breeding approaches such as bulk, composites, and single pod descent. The pedigree method of breeding,
however, will continue to have its utility in the genetic enhancement of qualitative traits like yield.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology,Sociology and Political Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Geography, Planning and Development,General Social Sciences,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education,Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Software,Artificial Intelligence,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Networks and Communications,Software,Artificial Intelligence,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Software,General Engineering
Reference6 articles.
1. Byth, D.E., Wallis, E.S., and Saxena, K.B. (1981). Adaptation and breeding strategies for pigeonpea. Pages 450-465. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpeas, Volume 1. 15 -19 December 1980. ICRISAT Patancheru, India. 2. Cannell, M.G.R., Njuguna, C.K., Ford, E.D., Smith, R., and Ross-Parker, H.M. (1977). Variation in yield among competing individuals within mixed genotypes stands of tea, a selection problem. Journal of Applied Ecology 14: 969-985. 3. Hamblin, J. (1977). Plant breeding interpretations of the effects of bulk breeding on four populations of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 26: 157-168. 4. Roy Sharma, R.P., Thakur, H.C., and Sharma, H.M. (1981). Pigeonpea as a rabi crop in India. Pages 26-36. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpeas, Volume 1, 15 -19 December 1980. ICRISAT Patancheru, India. 5. Rossini, M.A., Maddonni, G.A., and Otegui, M.E. (2011). Inter-plant competition for resources in maize crops grown under contrasting nitrogen supply and density: variability in plant and ear growth. Field Crops Research 121: 373-380.
|
|