Affiliation:
1. Kumar
2. Young Scientist (Associate Professor) Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700020, West Bengal, India
Abstract
Introduction: Management of benign vocal fold nodular lesion provides a particularly good window into the revolution of voice surgery. The
changes in approach to surgical management have resulted largely because of advancement in knowledge of anatomy and physiology of the vocal
fold layered structures & technological developments that have improved our ability to examine and quantify voice function and the availability of
better surgical instruments. Aims: Comparison of Microap technique with conventional method for benign vocal fold nodular lesion and
Comparison of Intropertive and post-operative parameters like operative time, primary bleeding, operative procedures, residual tissue, collateral
damage, postoperative complication, recovery time and so on between two methods. Materials and Methods: This study was Prospective
Randomised single blind trial study. This study was conducted at Patna Medical College & Hospital, Department of ENT from Feb 2020-August
2022. Result: We found in Conventional Group, the mean Total Score of Pre-op Video Stroboscopy (Individual) (mean± s.d.) of patients was
9.2632± 1.9268. In Micro Flap Group, the mean Total Score of Pre-op Video Stroboscopy (Individual) (mean± s.d.) of patients was 8.7857±
1.6898. Difference of mean Total Score of Pre-op Video Stroboscopy (Individual) with both Group was not statistically signicant (p=0.2413). In
Conventional Group, the mean Total Score of Post-op Video Stroboscopy (mean± s.d.) of patients was 2.2895 ± 3.3684. Conclusion:We found that
Mean Total Score of Post-op Video Stroboscopy was higher in Conventional compared to Micro Flap group which was statistically signicant. It
was showed that Mean Video Stroboscopy Outcome Difference (Pre-Post) was less in Conventional compared to Micro Flap group which was
statistically signicant
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Philosophy,Classics,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Mechanical Engineering,General Chemical Engineering,Infectious Diseases,Cell Biology,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Biochemistry,Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),History,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Business and International Management,Mechanical Engineering,Ocean Engineering,Aerospace Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering,Statistical and Nonlinear Physics,Statistics and Probability,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Management Science and Operations Research,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability
Reference10 articles.
1. Zeitels SM, Healy GB. Laryngology and phonosurgery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug;349(9):882–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035148. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra035148. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Altman KW. Vocal fold masses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;40(5):1091–108
3. Singhal, P., Bhandari, A., Chouhan, M., Sharma, M. P., & Sharma, S. Benign tumors of the larynx: a clinical study of 50 cases. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2009;61(1), 26-30. [PubMed]
4. Ahmed, S. U., Kabir, M., Alam, A. K., Hasan, D. M., Ahmed, K. U., & Khan, H. S. Benign vocal cord lesions-a study of 25 cases. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2006.
5. Cohen SM. Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment‐seeking population. The Laryngoscope. 2012;122(2):343-8.