COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PROPOFOL AND DEXMEDETOMIDINE INFUSION FOR HYPOTENSIVE ANESTHESIA DURING FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Author:

Devi Meenakshi1,Atri Ankita2,Singh Gurjinder3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, GMC Jammu, India

2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, GMC Jammu, India.

3. Senior Resident, Department of Anesthesia, V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi

Abstract

Background: Intense bleeding during general anesthesia is the major limitation during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. It affects operative eld visibility and increases complications. Hypotensive anesthesia is preffered to improve surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efcacy of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion for hypotensive anesthesia in patients undergoing FESS. To compare the efcacy Objective: and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for hypotensive anesthesia in functional endoscopic sinus surgeries. This Materials and methods: prospective randomized trial was conducted in 60 adult patients who were scheduled for FESS under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group P (n = 30) received propofol infusion of 50–150mcg/kg/min and group D (n = 30) received dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1 mcg/kg diluted in 10 mL 0.9% saline to be infused over 10 min after induction, followed by maintenance infusion of 0.4–0.8 mcg/kg/h. The infusions were titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 60 and 70 mm Hg and hemodynamic stability. Intraoperative blood loss, quality of the surgical eld (Fromme- Boezaart scale), hemodynamic control, and patient recovery were recorded. Results: In our study, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate were signicantly lower in group D throughout the surgery than in group P. Blood loss was signicantly higher in group P (105.82 ± 15.16 ml) than in group D (90.50 ± 16.78 ml). The Fromme's score (Surgical eld visibility) 1/2/3 was comparable between the groups. The awakening time was signicantly short in group D than group P. Intraoperatively, only one incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was observed in group D (2.5%) compared to that in group P, which was managed successfully. In our Conclusion: study, we observed that both dexmedetomidine and propofol are efcacious and safe drugs for achieving controlled hypotension during FESS; however, dexmedetomidine provides better hemodynamic control and is associated with lesser degree of sedation without any signicant adverse effects.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

Virology,Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Microbiology,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Internal Medicine,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Pharmacology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Medicine,Dermatology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Gastroenterology,Hepatology,Hematology,Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine,Surgery,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3