Affiliation:
1. Assistant Professor, Dept of General Surgery, Kurnool Medical College.
2. General Surgery Resident, Kurnool Medical College.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wound Healing is the summation of a number of processes that follow injury. Despite immense
advances in the technique of wound creation and closure, there continues to be an important percentage of patients
undergoing abdominal operations, suffering from delayed wound healing and partial wound failure. Apart from increasing patient morbidity and
hospital stay, it also is a psychological blow to both the surgeon and patient alike.
The incidence of post-operative wound dehiscence was investigated in patients in several studies (e.g., 1.25 per 1,000 discharges at 0 to 17 years,
1.74 at 18 to 44 years, 2.65 at 45 to 65 years, and 3.77 at 65 or more years. Additionally, it was found that this complication resulted in an
increased mean length of stay (by 21.1 days) and a tremendous increase in charges for affected patients, with 5.7 times higher odds of in-hospital
mortality.Wound Infection rate varies from 6.8 percent to 21.4 percent depending on the procedure and other patient factors. The aim of this
study is to assess the various factors inuencing post laparotomy wound healing. To identify the pre-operative, operative and post operative risk
factors in patients having poor wound healing.
RESULTS This prospective study was conducted in Government General Hospital, kurnool. A total of 100 patients undergoing laparotomies
were studied .40 patients were found to have delayed wound healing. The strongest association for delayed healing was found to be wound
infection, followed by chronic cough,steroids and poorly controlled diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of delayed healing was found to be higher in our study with increased incidence of wound infection. It was found that emergency
laparotomies were associated with an increased incidence of wound infection and thereby delayed healing. Poor wound healing is also
associated strongly with poor nutrition and uncontrolled diabetes. These factors should be taken into account and efforts have to be made to
correct the risk factors pre or post-operatively.
Reference9 articles.
1. McDonald K, Romano P, Davies S, Haberland C, Geppert J, Ku A, Choudhry K, Postoperative wound dehiscence: number of abdomino-pelvic surgery patients with disruption of abdominal wall per 1,000 eligible admissions.
2. Bruce F. Farber MD and Richard P. Wenzel MD, Postoperative wound infection rates: Results of prospective statewide surveillance Bobbie Mason RN, Research and investigation of postoperative wound infections
3. R.C.G Russell, Norman S Williams, Christopher J.K. Bulstrode, Bailey and LoveShort Practice of Surgery, 24th ed, Hodder Arnold Publication; page 84
4. Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr. Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Juvonen T et al. Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy.
5. Vasureddy Challa, Anitha Dhar, Sneh Anand, Anurag Srivastava, Roshan Lall Gupta; Recent Advances in Surgery; page 225-246