COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT AND CLINICAL OUTCOME OF INTRAMEDULLARY VERSUS EXTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION FOR UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES

Author:

Prasad Lal Bahadur1,Kumar Bijoy2,Manjhi L.B.3

Affiliation:

1. Senior Resident, Academic, S.N.M.M.C.H., Dhanbad.

2. Associate Professor, Department of orthopaedics, RIMS, Ranchi

3. HOD, Department Of Orthopaedics, RIMS, Ranchi.

Abstract

Introduction: Surgery is the common therapy for intertrochanteric fractures as this fracture takes a long time to heal on its own. Open reduction and internal xation (ORIF) is one of the surgical treatments for this fracture (4). Based on the location and type of the fracture different kinds of xation devices are used. However, the best repairing method for intertrochanteric fractures is still controversial. To Evaluate Aim And Objective: functional outcome and Compare the result of treatment with intramedullary (PFN) versus extramedullary (DHS and PFLCP) xation for unstable intertrochantric fracture. In this prospective study from March 2018 to October 2019, 40 conse Methodology: cutive patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures having an unstable pattern, of either sex were randomized by computer generated tables to undergo xation with either Intramedullary and extramedullary xation.A detailed history and clinical examination was done in a systemic manner and noted on a specially designed proforma. Plain radiographs were obtained on admission and all fractures categorized according to AO/ASIF. In Result: intramedullary group the mean blood loss was 142.5 ml whereas in DHS group it was 330 ml and PFLCP group it was 415 ml. In intramedullary group 5% subjects had wound infection, In DHS group 10% subjects each had malunion, wound infection and screw cutout, whereas in PFLCP group 2(20%) subjects each had wound infection and screw cutout. in unstable intertrochante Conclusion: ric fractures, the intramedullary xation has signicantly better outcome in terms of early restoration of walking ability, shorter operative time, a smaller incision and less blood loss during surgery as compare to extramedullary xation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference9 articles.

1. Singh D, Singh A, Singh G, Singh M, Sandhu A, Sandhu KS. Comparative Study of the Management of Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur With Proximal Femoral Nail vs. the Dynamic Hipscrew With Derotation Screw in Elderly Population. Cureus. 2021;13(11):1–6.

2. Thuan V Ly, Marc F Swiontkowski, Management of femoral neck fractures in young adult, IJO, 2008;42(1) :29–34.

3. Parker MJ, Das A. Extramedullary fixation implants and external fixators for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(2):1-8.

4. Andalib A, Etemadifar M, Yavari P. Clinical outcomes of intramedullary and extramedullary fixation in unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A randomized clinical trial. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020;8(2):190–7.

5. Rks D, Jain S, Verma R, Prajapati J. Original Article A comparative study of intramedullary and extramedullary fixation devices in type two unstable trochanteric fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;23(2):2–6.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3