Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar,New Delhi-110060,India.
Abstract
Introduction: Induction of labour is the artificial initiation of labour before its spontaneous onset for the purpose of
delivery of the foetoplacental unit.The purpose of this study was to determine whether the current practice of elective
labour induction was associated with differences in mode of delivery,demand for pain relief and foetal outcomes when
compared with labour of spontaneous onset.
Methods And Materials: This cross-sectional study carried out on 100 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy
between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation with cephalic presentation delivering in labour room. This study included two
groups:Electively induced (50) and spontaneous group (50).
Results: In electively induced group 44% had normal vaginal delivery and 6% had instrumental delivery. With
spontaneous labour,78% had normal vaginal delivery and 4% had instrumental delivery.Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)
was 20% in electively induced group and 6% in the spontaneous group (p-0.038).Apgar scores,mean birth weights were
comparable. Analgesia demand was 22% in the electively induced group when compared to 6% in the spontaneous
group.
Conclusion:The present study emphasizes that elective induction of labour in nulliparous women with a single cephalic
presentation is associated with increased risk of caesarean section, which is predominantly related to an unfavorable
cervix. Hence, elective induction is safe and efficacious. Caesarean delivery rate was more due to nulliparity or
unfavorable cervix not due to elective induction itself.
Reference20 articles.
1. Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Kishi GY. The epidemiology of labour induction: Arizona, 1997. Am J ObstetGynecol 2000; 182:1355-62.
2. Goffinet F, Dreyfus M, Carbonne B, Magnin G, Cabrol D. (Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labour induction in France). J GynecolObstetBiolReprod (Paris) 2003; 32: 638-46.
3. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cardenas V, Nelson JC, Holt VL, Gardella C, Easterling TR. Induction of labour in the absence of standard medical indications: incidence and correlates. Med Care 2007; 45:505-12.
4. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100:164-7.
5. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006; 55:1-101.