THE CHALLENGES AND PITFALLS OF LIMB-LEADS AND HEART-AXIS CALCULATIONS “THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE OVERALL MAGNITUDES OF BIPOLAR AND AUGMENTED UNIPOLAR LEADS CANNOT BE EXPLAINED WITH THE OHM'S LAW”

Author:

Novosel Dragutin1,Zuljevic P.2,Alanovic M.3,Zunac Robert4,Becic Tina5

Affiliation:

1. MD.

2. Cand. Med.

3. MSEE

4. Mr.Sci., MSEE

5. MD, PhD, Faculty of Medicine, Split, Croatia, Department of Cardiology

Abstract

Summary Our paper analyses the interdependence between the overall magnitudes and resistances of bipolar and augmented unipolar limb leads of electrocardiograms. The findings strongly indicate that the overall ratio of magnitude of the bipolar and augmented unipolar limb leads is not a constant value, whereas the overall ratio of resistance is a constant value. These results expand but partially contradict a previous study. The ratio of the magnitude of bipolar leads to augmented unipolar leads is between 1 and 4/3 with a mean value of 2/√3, and this ratio is a function of the electrical axis of the heart. Our results also show that the overall ratio of resistance between bipolar and augmented unipolar limb leads approaches the value of 4/3. Conclusively, the ratio of magnitudes between limb leads is not a constant value, the ratio of resistances can be assumed as a constant value and therefore the difference of magnitudes between limb leads cannot be explained with the Ohm's law

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

General Engineering,General Materials Science,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Materials Chemistry,Metals and Alloys,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,History and Philosophy of Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),History,History,Cultural Studies,Political Science and International Relations,Religious studies,Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies,History,Cultural Studies,Law,Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies,History,Cultural Studies,Geology,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3