COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF TATTOO REMOVAL WITH SINGLE SESSION OF R20 TECHNIQUE AND CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE

Author:

Bhagwat Mohini S.1,Agrawal Sharmila J.2,V. Saoji Virendra3

Affiliation:

1. Junior Resident, Department of dermatology, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh memorial medical college, Amravati.

2. Senior Resident, Department of dermatology, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh memorial medical college, Amravati.

3. Associate professor, Department of dermatology, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh memorial medical college, Amravati.

Abstract

Background: Most suitable devices for tattoo removal at present are Q-switched ruby, Nd:YAG and Alexandrite lasers. 1 These are the current gold standard for laser tattoo removal . But there are few limitations, such as long duration of treatment, large interval between sessions; side effects such as blistering, scarring and dyschromia. The current methods attempted to reduce the total number of sessions and total duration to achieve clearing of tattoos. R20 method of tattoo removal is based on principle of repeated exposure of laser light in a single session. Aim: 1) to compare lightning of tattoos with a single pass Q-switched laser treatment with 4 treatment passes separated by 20 minutes 2) To compare the Adverse effects between two methods Methods and Material: It included 50 patients and were divided in half and randomized. Half of them received single pass treatment with Q-switched Nd:YAG laser 1064 nm used at energy of 360 mJ. Other half received multipass treatment (each pass at 20 minutes interval with maximum of 4 pass). Tattoo lightening and adverse effects compared 1month later i.e. after single session. Results: 1 month later, treatment with the R20 method was much more effective than conventional single-pass laser treatment. With R20 method, 100% patients experienced immediate erythema and edema, 16% patient experienced blistering, crusting. No obvious Scarring/permanent pigmentary changes in any patient. >75% fading experienced by 18 patients after single session, 50-75% fading in 4 patients, 40% experienced transient hypopigmentation. With single pass technique, all patients experienced <50% fading. Conclusion: With R20 method the number of sessions required for tattoo removal is greatly reduced thus decreasing the number of visits. It is more effective but also safe in most of the patients. The disadvantages are one single session can take 3½ to 4 hours.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3