COMPARISON OF SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE DRAIN ON POSTOPERATIVE SEROMA FORMATION FOLLOWING MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN NORTH INDIA

Author:

Mohd Athar Mohd Athar1,Kala Sanjay2,Deb Adiveeth3,Kumar Ramendra3

Affiliation:

1. MS (General Surgery), Associate Professor, Dept. Of General Surgery, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur

2. MS (General Surgery), Professor,dept. Of General Surgery, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur.

3. Junior Resident, Dept Of General Surgery, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of drains on seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer is the most investigated and most controversial topic of debate for the clinical researchers. Hence this study was conducted to compare single drain and double drain among women with breast cancer who underwent MRM in preventing seroma formation and also to determine the role of other predictors on the same. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A hospital based non-randomized controlled trial was conducted among 84 women (42 women each in single drain and double drain group respectively) with breast cancer who underwent modied radical mastectomy in the department of General Surgery, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur from January 2019 to October 2020. All women were followed up after insertion of either single or double drain following MRM for seroma formation. The mean age of the study RESULTS: participants was 46.4 (12.1) years. The incidence of seroma formation was found to be 26.2% (95% CI: 17.5%-37.1%). On logistic regression 2 analysis there was a signicant association for BMI > 25 kg/m , hypertension and lymph node status with seroma formation. However, there was no signicant association for age, Diabetes Mellitus and number of drains (p>0.05) in logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Single or double drain techniques are equally effective in reducing the seroma formation ad associated complications following modied radical mastectomy. Lymph node status, BMI and hypertension were found to inuence seroma formation in our study. Further research with a larger sample size at a multicentric level is needed to make our study results robust for better management of these patients.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3